Okay.
No number 021, Avenue, Sacramento, California, 95826, parcel number 0 610131 0 0 2 0 0 0 0.
Days, November 13th, 2024.
My name's Paul Lovato.
I'm a building inspector with the housing and dangerous buildings.
This case opened on February 16th, 2023, in the current case status is open.
Protest to some reaction and our fees will not be heard today. This appeals limited to the notice in order and to pay cost and penalties only
Initial inspection inspection was performed on May 14th, 2024 by building inspector Paul Obato
Inspection identified the property was in violation of Sacramento City Code
section
96.1
Property address 2613, Patton Way, Sacramento, California 95818.
Personal number 0, 0, 9, 0, 2, 9, 1, 0, 0, 8, 0, 0, 0, 0.
Today's January 10th, 2024.
My name is Paul Lovato.
I'm a building inspector for the Housing and Dangerous Buildings.
Case open on June 2nd, 2023.
Current case status, it's closed.
--
I took pictures around the site for the case documents.
I then called the number on the sign out in front of the property and received a voicemail.
I left a message with my information asking for a return call back.
On June 7th, 2023, property owner Paul Lenseth, not the legal property owner,
visited the office of concerns of the city's initial visit.
I explained to the property owner an inspection of the detached garage would need to be done to verify the work performed.
He then stated that he visited the office prior to commencing work and was told if he repaired 100 square feet or less, a permit was not required.
--
Hello.
I supervise a reply, Carolyn.
For our brief conversation yesterday, I'm following up.
I spoke with the building inspector case manager Paul of auto this morning.
And as of right now, Paul and I will be available for inspection on Thursday, October 12th at either 11 o'clock or 1 o'clock p.m.
Or Friday, October 13th at either 11 o'clock or 1 o'clock p.m.
If these times do not work this week, we can schedule next week.
Give us a day.
--
And even though we told him we had a case, they assigned us to somebody.
He said, well, we can't help you.
You have to call the other.
Paul Paul was working.
So that went on.
So finally, we kept getting bills and we didn't know what was happening.
And I was becoming a nervous right.
All right, thank you.
Now we will call item number five, inspector Lothar.
And Mr. Yang, Mrs. Yang, or whoever would like to, we have a couple of seats up there.
Paul, Melody, Janelle, and Destiny.
Who do we have?
I'm assuming Paul and-
Oh, Joseph?
All Joseph and Melody?
Yes.
--
The owner of the majority, Mazar, he has the units 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19,
20, 21, 8, 21, B, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 30.
The cosmetology units are 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 owned by Tran Nugin, Tran Nugin Vogue.
The unit 12 is owned by Paul Joseph Melody Yang, and unit 15 is owned by Che Tram, based
on my assessment, based on my assessment principal, building inspector Cosley declared
the structure immediately dangerous at 840AM, I called PNP demolition, there was no answer,
I left the voicemail asking them to return my call at 850AM, I called GW demolition,
--
18th, 2024, I approve K-2s for the completion of the emergency demo on 9-4-24 for GW invoice,
11890, and attached it to the case. The invoices of this property were split into four invoices,
per parcels and percentages, which is being appealed here today.
Build owner percentages, Paul Joseph and Melody Yang were, or are the owners of Unit 12,
was billed for a total of 2.72% of the total cost of the demolition.
A train is the owner of Unit 15, was billed a total of 1.22 of the total of the cost of the
demolition. Moz, the majority holder, was billed 80.9% of the total cost of the demolition.
So, I'm not even able to get a hold of his mother.
So, right now, we're just waiting on our attorney to let us know when it's done.
Like you said, it's more than $10,000 that we've been waiting.
And once we did find out, we did reach out to Paul.
My husband, he had been a communication with them.
So, as our attorney, I'm just trying to let them know we're not able to do anything.
Still receiving the bills as well as long as with the late fees.
--
Right now, we're kind of at this.
Probably we're kind of at this.
I feel like to say also what my wife said.
Paul, a couple of minutes.
Call her to paperwork.
attorney.
Doing the best we can to get out of this situation with these people out of there.
--
That wouldn't have been a proper address for you anyway.
No.
All right.
Paul, I have a couple.
So you mentioned in your summary that it was a third monitoring fee.
Yet I don't see a list of when you visited it previously.
I mean, except for the November, the notice in order date.
--
especially when you have no forward in address or contact info for the person who's on the lease.
So I believe what he was saying is so those fees had already been charged previously,
apparently before you were aware of it.
And so I think what Paul was saying is that now that you're in contact,
you'll be able to maybe not prevent them all, but at least mitigate some of that process
that may stem some of the future fees.
I'm not speaking for them, but you'll be able to talk to them about that.